The point to note is that during his visit to the site on Sept. 5, 2003, the user "90sareover" showed up in Lemire's logs both as 66.185.84.204 and as 66.185.84.200, although only visiting the site briefly. Klatt is unable to explain this, but it is a phenomenon that is worth keeping in mind, since if 90sAREover had hit return in one of the moments when his traffic was being channeled through 66.185.84.200, we'd not be having this discussion.
Friday, February 22, 2008
Klatt's testimony, or sometimes 204 = 200
Here are pages 1636-8 of Richard Warman and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal v. Marc Lemire (T1073/5405 vol. 9) of Feb. 8, 2007. In it, Bernard Klatt is testifying about the logs of Lemire's site.
The point to note is that during his visit to the site on Sept. 5, 2003, the user "90sareover" showed up in Lemire's logs both as 66.185.84.204 and as 66.185.84.200, although only visiting the site briefly. Klatt is unable to explain this, but it is a phenomenon that is worth keeping in mind, since if 90sAREover had hit return in one of the moments when his traffic was being channeled through 66.185.84.200, we'd not be having this discussion.
The point to note is that during his visit to the site on Sept. 5, 2003, the user "90sareover" showed up in Lemire's logs both as 66.185.84.204 and as 66.185.84.200, although only visiting the site briefly. Klatt is unable to explain this, but it is a phenomenon that is worth keeping in mind, since if 90sAREover had hit return in one of the moments when his traffic was being channeled through 66.185.84.200, we'd not be having this discussion.