In his testimony, however, Bernard Klatt seems to have missed this important fact. Indeed, when the topic of Rogers web-caching arose, he pleaded ignorance.
Since the IP in question was a such a proxy, and in fact the single most relevant fact to the case, Klatt's admission has the effect of rendering his testimony useless.Other posts in the Klatt's clunkers series:
- Klatt's clunkers 1: Bernard Klatt given an award for tendentious testimony
- Klatt's clunkers 2: Bernard Klatt wrong on IE 6 date
- Klatt's clunkers 3: Bernard Klatt misreads the user agent string
- Klatt's clunkers 4: Bernard Klatt mistakes the combined log format for the common log format
- Klatt's clunkers 5: Bernard Klatt doesn't recognize RealPlayer browser
- Klatt's clunkers 6: Bernard Klatt on Rogers service in BC
- Klatt's Clunkers 7: Bernard Klatt doesn't understand Rogers web caching
- Klatt's Clunkers 8: Bernard Klatt comes close on proxies
- Klatt's Clunkers: why Bernard Klatt should be disbelieved (summary thread)